Google Marketing Live 2024 (GML 2024) received mixed reactions from experts, with many expressing skepticism about the relevance and innovation of the event, particularly for B2B and smaller advertisers.
AI and Automation
- Amalia Fowler expressed confusion over Google's contradictory statements about AI not replacing marketers but being able to do marketing strategy. She emphasized the need for advertisers with minimal budgets to carefully consider their strategies.
- Jeremy Krantz found GML 2024 underwhelming from a B2B perspective, noting the lack of surprises or unexpected announcements.
- Sarah Stemen believes AI asset production in Pmax can be powerful for rapid testing. However, she found the delivery of ads in AI overviews unclear.
- Navah Hopkins highlighted updates relevant to B2B/Lead gen, including image to video ads, brand controls, and profit bidding.
- Niki Grant sees brand guidelines and new visual formats as positive steps for advertisers wanting to maintain control while riding the AI wave.
Performance Max (PMax)
- Fowler and Scott Carruthers welcomed the list of 100 users for lookalike and more insights for Performance Max, respectively.
- Julie Friedman Bacchini appreciated asset level reporting and YouTube exclusions in PMax but questioned the generative AI's ability to predict performance.
B2B and Lead Generation
- Krantz and Jyll Saskin-Gales expressed disappointment over the lack of focus on B2B and lead generation.
Visual and Shopping Ads
- Stemen and Grant showed interest in the enhancements in shopping formats, including virtual try-on and 3D product images.
- Bacchini questioned the control over review text being pulled into shopping ads.
Overall, while some updates were welcomed, advertisers expressed fatigue over frequent AI-driven changes and a desire for better updates and clearer understanding of their impact, especially for smaller brands.